This latest speech by Obama was short and to the point. Obama's handlers realize that when Obama talks too much, it's just not good...for him or America. Such is the inevitable outcome, when you declare War on Achievement.

One of my fellow Conservative bloggers [Right to the End] chronicled how the stock market has reacted to Obama, just a few days after his election:

In the two days of trading on the NYSE since the presidential election, the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) has lost a record-breaking 929.49 points. After the Dow closed at 9625.28 on Election Day, Barack Obama was declared the winner of the 2008 Presidential Election just a few hours later. The Dow responded by closing at 9139.27 (486.01 point loss) on Wednesday, then 8695.79 (443.48 point loss) on Thursday. As of today, November 7, 2008, The Dow has not had a bigger two-day point loss in its 80-year history.

And the freefall continues.

Since Obama's election, the stock market has now tumbled 2000 points. Obama speeches and "big events" scare the heck out of me. My portfolio called the other day, and left a message that just said, "Dang, Kev!" I completely understood.

This "snippet" press conference came after only two days from the prior address to Congress that pre-empted American Idol. "I'm your American Idol, damnit".

Obama tried selling his message during prime time, but apparently to no avail. Obamulus von Porkulus, aka Spendulus, aka Turdulus didn't sell…again. He didn't get the "bump" he was expecting, after that 'rousing' speech, so we got another. What do you bet we get another really soon? I guess no matter how you spin it, a turd is still a turd. Recall that I told you Obama will not be happy unless he can convert everybody to his way of thinking. But why penalize American investors with yet another press conference? To promote the new Recovery Plan, stupid!

Recovery Plan? Where did this new term come from? Apparently the polls are in, and "stimulus" was a "bombulus", and thus sent packing back to Greece…along with those Greek columns. So "recovery" is the new word of the day. As for Obama's non-recovery plan, let's be clear that it won't recover anything meaningful to American taxpayers. This so-called recovery plan is meant to recover one thing: All Republican held seats for Democrats, at the expense of the American achievers.

Obama was quick to remind us (within one minute of his speech), yet again, that he inherited a $1T debt. And like all good economists, Obama wants to convince us that going into more debt is the way out of debt. I'm sure this is how it works in your home. And if not, why are you being so obtuse. Spend infidel, spend!

Further, Obama deflects you from the fact that he has spent more money in 30 days, than Bush has spent in 8 years. That's what happens when you give a brother too much credit!

Finally, Obama took another swipe at "the boogeyman", explaining that much of the debt from Iraq and Afghanistan is off the books, implying illegalities, and gross waste and mismanagement, and again providing a little "smoke and mirrors" from his shenanigans. Imagine a guy who spends trillions like Paris Hilton slams tequila shots has the nerve to criticize a few billion spent on an actual war…backed by Congress.

Here's the wrap:

It has been determined by "the powers that be", that Obama can't have a rousing performance, when his speeches (1) go beyond sound bites, and (2) are not attended by paid supporters, like supposedly homeless Black women, ACORN members, lobbyists, terrorists, all people receiving tax rebates undeservedly, and finally…liberals in Congress. I apologize for some of the redundancies in that list.

There may be a tendency for the weak among you to start believing that Obama is serious about helping Americans. But don't be fooled by Obama's sound bites and "hopeful" tone of hopelessness without him. There are still the usual Obama "get out of jail free" clauses and other disclaimers.

Buried in the "openness" of his legislation, and the crisis on which he continues to sell us, is the real agenda. Obama will abandon the War on Terror, and replaced it with the new War on Achievement.

Be sure to get Obama's new book: The Tax Man Cometh...and He Has a Gold Tooth

That's my rant!

© 2009 Kevin Jackson – The Black Sphere All Rights Reserved

We got change, but somewhere in the first 30 days of ObamaNation we lost hope. The title of Obama's book was prophetic…The Audacity of Hope. It might have been more aptly titled, "The Audacity of You to Have Hope".

Obama has now informed us that hope has been found. Apparently hope is a rebellious 16-year old, who didn't want to listen to Obama. The people who voted for "hope and change" might be smart to follow hope's example.

Nevertheless, the real first Black president and second 3^rd-term president n in the history of the US warned his younger protégé Obama to be more optimistic. Put the "O" in optimism, son.  Get hope back. Ironic, Bill Clinton asking Obama for change…back to hope. Are you as confused as I am?

Obama's speech sounded like more of the same to me. He tried to hide his real disdain for America…excuse me, rich Americans. He made sure to put the problems on the previous administration, reminding us, yet again that he inherited this mess we call America. And it is his ideas and our unwavering support (of his ideas) that will get us through.

Of course I didn't expect him to blame himself and the rest of his cronies in congress, the real culprits who exacerbated the financial crisis, and many others. He did manage however to blame (a) the people he is rewarding, as well as (b) the banks who donated to his campaign in this comment:

"People bought homes they knew they couldn't afford…from banks and lenders who pushed those bad loans anyway."

As we can see, Obama is an equal opportunity punisher to those whom he has bought and paid for. Nothing like a little "pimp slap" to remind people that they are nothing more than prostitutes.

What were noticeably missing for me in this speech were the congratulations for those of us who have built small businesses and pay our taxes and our bills. Now that would have provided the fabric an uplifting speech.

"Thanks to those of you whom I am robbing, raping, and raking over the hot embers of the fire of socialism.  You know who you are. You are the hardworking Conservatives who have struggled to get where you are. You are my top priority in my War on Achievement. You have and will continue to carry the brunt of the burden for these deadbeats I need to pay back."

I did manage to find the place where the speech became optimistic, and it proved that hope is still alive. It is when Obama said the following:

"None of this will come without cost, nor will it be easy…"

I knew there was hope in there somewhere.  Who knows how much Obama's War on Achievement will ultimately cost? But the hope is that America will continue to approve the decimation of its "best and brightest".  One can only hope.  

But you can bet that as Obama held his recent summit on fiscal responsibility, and asked the nation to tighten its belt, he won't be doing the same.  No hope needed on that one, on this you can bank.

Here's the wrap:

Obamulus von Porkulus has been an albatross around Obama's neck. This state of the Union address to Congress was nothing more than an attempt to sell America and the world more words. Nothing has changed, except his approval numbers. Let's just say they aren't getting better for Obama.

There was nothing inspiring in this speech, but he will likely get a bump in his approval numbers. It won't last long, as I believe his followers are getting a bit tired of the rhetoric, and the media will follow soon enough. There is such a thing as over-selling. And by the way, his ideas are truly…stupid.

For now however, I'm glad some in America believe that we have found hope. But like authorities treat many 16-year old runaways, hope will get no real help. So our hopes have been placed in the sweaty palms of pimps and predators.

For hope's sake, I hope she is still lost and trying to find her own way.

That's my rant!

© 2009 Kevin Jackson – The Black Sphere All Rights Reserved

If you think that the budget to "save America's financial markets" was big, wait until you get a gander at this package. 

This package is on Enzyte with a Viagra chaser, as estimates are that Americans spend $2.4T on healthcare annually. Yes, there goes that trillion word again.

Despite the fact that people from all over the world, particularly those with means come to America to get the best health care, Obama provides yet another doomsday scenario on America. Health care is the scare. At his next press conference, expect to see a religious revival, and an wagon train of invalids, "yearning to be free"...or healed.

It's no secret that Obama wants what is termed "universal coverage" of all Americans, a euphemism for "socialized" medicine. It disturbs him that the US is the only "civilized" country who has opted out of socialized medicine. Disregard that he and all other politicians will not be on the system he wants for you and me, nor will anybody of means in the country. Because make no mistake about it, the privileged and the rich will not wait for health care like the rest of us who will be on the equivalent of the "IRS meets US Postal System" of health care.

Why wait less at the hospital, when you can wait more? Here is what we can expect under ObamaNation, as evidenced by Canada's health care statistics:

"Canadians also experience waits for medical emergency and specialist services, although there are high numbers of people waiting under both the U.S. and Canadian systems. Studies by the Commonwealth Fund found that 24% of Canadians waited 4 hours or more in the emergency room, vs. 12% in the U.S.; 57% waited 4 weeks or more to see a specialist, vs. 23% in the U.S."

Why not get a system that costs more and provides doctors and nurses with no incentive to be the best? For a comparison of the US system compared to the world, visit this site:

There are two key points to almost all comparisons. The first is cost. What you will find in all comparisons of socialized medicine versus the current American system with respect to cost is this statement:

"Biggest challenges: Controlling costs, improving efficiency. Government currently cutting number of acute hospital beds and promoting computerized medical records to curb redundancy. Shifting some doctor duties to nurses."

Do you really believe government is going to "curb costs"? And though nurses can do many things doctors can, you can't sue nurses! Oh, and you can't sue the government either…and win.

The second critical point is how doctors are compensated, and here is what you get:

"Doctors: Most paid by government through salary or fees; some doctors accept private insurance or fees directly from patients."

Do you really believe the best doctors will be government paid doctors? Yeah, because the government is so good at everything else, right?

I have as much interest in this system as watching two blind men talk in sign language.

Here's the wrap:

What Obama should be focused on is the waste and the fraud within the existing system.

Next, what Obama won't tell you is that we are already paying for socialized medicine in this country as I have stated time and time again. If an illegal alien has a heart attack, he is rushed to the nearest county hospital, treated, and you the American taxpayer foot the bill. It's not exactly "well baby care", but mission accomplished. And ObamaNation knows that healthcare is covered for the most part, and only needs tweaking, not destroying.

Yet, crisis management is the order of the day. So Obama and his clan are about to have another porkfest, at the expense of the best medical system in the world. The hidden agenda was recently passed Obamulus von Porkulus, and Liberals won't rest until they have given you the same system that the rest of the world has…crappy.

Liberals are meddlers. They don't really care about improving the quality of healthcare in America, they just care about making it "even" for everybody…even if even sucks!

That's my rant!

© 2009 Kevin Jackson – The Black Sphere All Rights Reserved

The other day Obama was in Colorado touting Namaste Solar as his new poster child for Obamulus von Porkulus, saying that his "spendulus" package would help Namaste Solar create more "green" energy, and of course more jobs. Job creation at Namaste Solar based on spendulus…18.

Blake Jones, self-proclaimed hippie, ex-Halliburton oddly enough, and co-founder of Namaste Solar was on stage with Obama and Biden talking "green" energy. He was also there to help sell Obama's turdburgers, explaining how spendulus was going to help his company and other solar companies. But as with all Obama poster children, the real story is what you don't know.

You see, Namaste Solar is run like a commune. According to my sources, everyone at this company makes the same salary. You might want to re-read that. This type of pay structure might entice low-dollar workers, however you'd be hard pressed to find a real entrepreneurial type who would work under those conditions.

And if that is not a crazy enough way to run a company, here's another policy that can only come from a warped hippie Liberal mind, and that is all employee decisions are made by consensus. Can you imagine trying to get a bunch of hippies to agree on anything via consensus? Maybe the quality and potency of regional marijuana, but that's about it?

Namaste has survived solely on government subsidies at the Federal, state and local level, or they admittedly would have failed. The green companies have little reason for true innovation, because they are being fed with the money of the American taxpayer. They are pigs being fattened, with no pressure of ever being eaten.

The breakthroughs in solar have come however, just not from companies like Namaste or from the government. But from a much more unlikely source.

One of the most recent breakthroughs in solar technology strangely enough, actually came from a 12-year old kid from Oregon named William Yuan. As reported in Maximum PC:

"Yuan, a seventh grader from Oregon, set out to improve solar technology, which at the moment could be a lot more efficient. And he appears to have done just that. Yuan's project, which he calls "A Highly-Efficient 3-Dimensional Nanotube Solar Cell for Visible and UV Light," could shake up the energy industry and lead to real change into how solar energy is harnessed and distributed."

Just to put it in perspective, for his revolutionary breakthrough in solar cell technology, Yuan will receive a $25,000 scholarship. But the Fed has been subsidizing solar technology for years, spending billions, and all the American public got was this t-shirt. Actually all we got was a hefty price tag for the black-eyes on the landscape.

And much of this funding went to Namaste, who prior to Obamulus von Porkulus was preparing to lay off much of its staff.

With the stimulus money they can now keep their staff and hire an additional 18 new people. I feel so stimulated that millions of taxpayers' dollars have gone to help prop up the dream of an aging hippie, running a commune at the taxpayers' expense. Nothing like seeing the Liberals utilizing the CIA: Communism In Action.

The Fed has spent literally billions of American taxpayer money funding "green" energy projects that the market has rejected with its pocketbook. Windmills were rejected because they are relatively inefficient, in comparison to other forms of energy. Bio-fuels needs three times the fossil fuels to create one time the product.

Here's the wrap:

As for Namaste Solar, "You are not smarter than a 5^th grader!" There has been more innovation from a 12-year old than has come from Namaste Solar and all its government subsidies. It's no secret as to why. Communist don't innovate.

Communists wait for the government to feed them, which is what has been happening for Namaste Solar in the past. And their future reward for doing nothing innovative is to get more and deeper handouts from ObamaNation. But let's give Obama credit as he was able to create 18 new jobs, and save about 40.

Only 4,099,942 more jobs for Obama to create or save by my math. That is if you don't count the 47, 000 that GM has announced recently they will need to layoff, even after receiving billions of our freshly minted greenbacks.

I'd call this Liberal math, wouldn't you?

That's my rant!

© 2009 Kevin Jackson – The Black Sphere All Rights Reserved

I chuckled when I read in the Washington Post that Hillary Clinton will be reaching out to the Islamic world, "to restore the image of the United States in the Islamic world". What an emissary to represent "us"!

According to the article, Secretary Clinton will be traveling to Indonesian, one time stomping ground of Obama himself. We can only hope that Clinton won't need to dodge any hostile surface-to-air missiles or gunfire, as she did in Bosnia when she was covering international affairs for America…as a housewife.

Like Obama did in Germany, Clinton will apologize on behalf of the United States for something. With the Liberals, there is always a reason for the US to apologize.

Perhaps she will apologize for our treatment of Islamic citizens in the US. Wait. No story there, as we don't behead Muslims for living in America, as they do us when we travel unprotected to their countries, however harmless our motives.  So it can't be our treatment of them.

Maybe Obama wants to export feminism. After all he has already exporting abortions, so why not introduce the Muslim world to all the tenets of the NOW Generation. If this is the case, then Obama has indeed picked the right poster child in Hillary Clinton.

What puzzles me, however is if Obama really wanted to reach out to the Islamic world, wouldn't he have picked a man? What about a Muslim man? From Muslim News:

"Middle Eastern governments shunned by the George Bush administration gave a cautious welcome to the new US President Barack Hussein Obama's pledge to reach out to the Muslim world, saying his policies needed to match his words."

Do Obama's policies match his words? Perhaps the first mistake for the Islamic world is believing Obama's words. Quoting Obama himself, "…they're just words".

Nevertheless, the first of many bad policy mistakes Obama made was selecting a neophyte, NOW-Generation woman as Secretary of State, and then beginning her tenure with the philosophically wrong premise.

Leave it to Obama to provide some nebulous term like "restoring America's image to the Islamic world", and send some poor loser out to preach "the message."  Restore our image to what?

I'm not sure how far you would have to go back in Islamic history to find when they loved us 'infidels"? I would even settle for liked or tolerated. I am no student of the Quran, but I googled "Muslim love infidel", and I got back a lot of info [457,000 items] on why Muslims cannot love the infidel, and should actually kill the infidel.  The fact is that the Muslim's have never loved the infidel, and they never will. 

Sending Clinton as the envoy to restore America's image in the Islamic world is indeed "putting lipstick on the pig"...pun intended. Why didn't he send her over with bags of seasoned pork rinds with her as gifts? That's right, all the pork was used up in the $787B Obamulus von Porkulus.

Regardless Hillary Clinton will go over in the Muslim world about as well as pork sausages at a Muslim picnic. I'm beginning to think that "reaching out to the Islamic world" equates to what Bill Clinton did in "putting the First Lady in charge of health care". We all know how that turned out.

Here's the wrap:

Obama knows this is a suicide mission. Clinton is a kamikaze. What better way to marginalize Madame Clinton, than to send her on Mission Impossible?

Obama has no doubt that Clinton will be a dismal failure for reasons too numerous to discuss in one blog. But most importantly for Obama, she will be embroiled in turmoil, occupied his entire four years. Brilliant move, except for dealing with the real issues of the role of Secretary of State.

And as for "restoring America's image to the Islamic world", if they find us infidels now, how do you think they will find us after dealing with one of our NOW-generation women for four years?

That's my rant!

© 2009 Kevin Jackson – The Black Sphere All Rights Reserved

The Department of Redundancy Department at ObamaNation reports the following breaking news…again: The stimulus bill is not stimulating at all.

This is not a deja vu moment, it is just Obama still selling low expectations at a high cost.

Just recently we got yet another doomsday prophecy from ObamaNation, as referenced in this report from the NY Times:

"As President Obama prepares to sign the $787 billion stimulus bill, administration officials sought to temper expectations, warning that the economy has not yet reached bottom and that increased economic activity as a result of the legislation would "take time to show up in the statistics.""

This is sounding suspiciously like the $700B the Fed needed to "restore the financial markets." Amazingly, all this money has not restored the financial markets, or at least my portfolio hasn't received the memo.

But we were told during the election that under Bush things just couldn't get any worse? Pray tell, did Obama lie?

Well the economy has indeed gotten worse, but Obama, our leader, purveyor of "hope and change", elected to inspire us, instead reminds us:  "I inherited this mess". Oh and would somebody bring me my brown underwear.

Obama's election was to be the cure for all our ills, or that is how the mainstream media sold it. Yet we find things "getting worse, before it gets better", as Biden prophesized much to the disdain of the "Immaculate Perception".

So to save us, Obama plans his West Coast swing where he will sign Obamulus von Porkulus into law, while simultaneously asking us to lower our expectations. Apparently stimulus is all fizzle with no sizzle fa shizzle.

You would have to be a complete moron to believe that the government can create any jobs, much less 4M new jobs.

Speaking of complete morons, what has Obama been up to since gaining approval of Obamulus von Porkulus last week?

First he went on a campaign tour pushing "turdburgers" to the American public who are obviously and overwhelmingly appalled at size and scope of "the package". [Excuse me while I whip this out!]

Next he spent a romantic weekend with 'his babies' momma', where I would guess the subject of "the package" was discussed, at length. Have fun with the sexual innuendo.

Finally, we were informed by the mainstream media that instead of taking a day off, Obama worked on president's day.  Diligent president he is, unrelenting in his pursuit of…trickeration?

With something so important you would think that one day could make a dramatic difference, yet Obama had the legislation on his desk last week, ready for signature. Why didn't he "git 'er done"?

Here's the wrap:

He didn't "git 'er done", because Obamulus von Porkulus was never about the economy!

Even Obama's own economic advisors won't take ownership of this turd. As a friend of mine wrote to me recently, "…looking for the good side of this so-called stimulus bill, is like saying you will pick up a turd from the clean end".

Inside of Obamulus von Porkulus are buried little Liberal jewels like health care reform, gun control, and other morsels of the Liberal agenda, particularly things that will reassure their easy election...in perpetuity!

And with 1000+ pages that were not read by anybody before signature, we are about to find out what core American values have been stabbed through the heart.

It's official…crisis averted.

That's my rant!

© 2009 Kevin Jackson – The Black Sphere All Rights Reserved

Sorry for not posting yesterday, but Bush and Cheney dropped in for a visit, and we took turns waterboarding Liberals.

Anyway, if you have ever have a taste for crow, just dine at the White House over the next four years, as crow is being served daily.

In the adoption of yet another of the "eight more years of the failed Bush policies", Obama must reconsider one of his uninformed, infantile stances during the campaign, that has indeed followed into his presidency.

Of which Bushism do I speak? The potential deployment of missile systems in Poland.

Obama is actually reconsidering his original stance on this. Who would have thunk it, right? When you consider how "spot on" he has been in so many other areas [no lobbyist, no pork, open and honest administration, highest ethics], and all the promises that he has kept thus far.

Now the story I read has this title: "Obama administration to take softer stance on missile defense". Based on this title, it is evident that the media is still worshipping at the altar of Obama, because the real title should have been something more like "Obama Owes Bush an Apology", or better yet "Obama Pimp-Slapped by Yet Another Bushism". 

Of course Obama and his media sycophants will frame this as, "The president has finally had time to study this…", blah blah blah, shish kum-ba. Translation for this would be that Obama had no idea what he was saying at the time, and he was selling America turd sandwiches with no mayonaise.

There will be no discussion of the fact that Bush got it right, because Obama is smarter than Bush, right?  So if Bush got it right, then that would make him smarter than Obama. And we have learned from the media, that no matter the subject, Obama is the smartest guy in the room. Haven't you seen his pensive look, head slightly tilted upward as he gazes yonder? That means he's smart, damnit!  Now don't you go getting all stupid on me Conservatives.

Ok enough fun. You see people, in the real world looking smart doesn't translate to being smart. And being made to appear dumb by the idiot media, doesn't make you dumb, as evidenced by Bush.

Bush's advantage? Information. When you are being briefed daily by our clandestine agencies, as Bush was, you get to make what is known as "informed decisions", and not stupid Ivy League, ivory tower, theoretical and ultimately stupid comments. Liberals, I suggest you re-read that part about "informed decisions".  And don't look for hope and change.

Think the media will credit Bush for using this missile system as a negotiation strategy with Russia to stop the Iranians from moving forward with their nuclear program? 

Here is how Yahoo News put it:

"Echoing Vice President Joe Biden , who said the new administration wants to push a "reset button" on U.S.- Russia relations,Undersecretary of State William Burns told the Interfax news agency inMoscow last week that, " The United States is quite open to the possibility of new forms of cooperation" with Moscow on missile defense, Iran and "the whole range of security issues with Russia .""

Well that's pretty close to an admission that Obama got it wrong, however I remind you that Bush is too dumb to have this as his strategy. 

From what I am taught, yes indoctrinated to believe, diplomacy just didn't exist in Bush's lexicon, even if this tactic might be considered hard-fisted diplomacy.  It is common knowledge, thanks to our mainstream media that Bush was a warmonger, intent on invading all non-US countries and protectorates…for oil!

Here's the wrap:

When it comes to security of America and international diplomacy, Bush played chess and Obama well, he is still playing with marbles in the dirt.

And while Obama and his gang of incompetents are pushing the "reset button" on US-Russia relations as Biden suggests, I suggest Obama go to Staples and see if he can find that "Easy" button. Something tells me he will need it.

Speaking of "reset buttons", I'm beginning to think there are few Obama kool-aid drinkers who wish they could push the reset button. Hopefully when finished with therapy, they may enter America "clean and sober". Let's say a short prayer for them…Amen.

As for eating crow, Obama shouldn't worry. I hear crow taste a lot like chicken.

That's my rant!

© 2009 Kevin Jackson – The Black Sphere All Rights Reserved

Usually I am not one to necessarily take a comment back, as it were.  However yesterday I said something that I do want to take back, and that was referring to Biden as "a retarded uncle".  All jokes aside, this was an insult to people with disabilities, and I apologize to them for the comment.

I don't normally care about "political correctness", however what I do care about are those who cannot fight for themselves. I have defended these people my entire life, and will continue to do so. They are those for whom I believe our compassion and charity is meant.

Right now in America children with disabilities are in a life and death struggle against Liberals, moreso than the rest of us. Because their very lives are at stake. Many are simply not being born.

A doctor runs a test on a pregnant mom, and a baby is terminated based solely on a test. "If my child is not perfect, then I don't want it" is the prevailing attitude.

I don't know the statistics, but I do know that an alarming number of children diagnosed with Down's Syndrome for example are killed each year in vitro , simply because the parents or the woman does not want to deal with that outcome. And they will say that it is for the child. But we all know that it is for the parent.

So let's create a world of athletes, intellectuals and beauty queens. That world would be fascinating, right? The snobbery at cocktail parties, and all the one-upmanship of "who knows who", and "look what I own". "I wish I had her legs, I wish I had his job, I wish I had his wife, and so on."

Some of us know or have known this world, and though it has its allure, after a while you want to "opt out". You opt out, because it's fake, fraud…phony.

And even if you don't know it at the most glamorous level, you see glimpses of it in your job, or in your own personal "Real 'Fake' Wives of Whatever City USA".  Ah, to wake up every day trying to please others.

So what do we ultimately want? We want something real.

Psychologists say that aside from basic survival needs as described by Maslow, what people really want, what really nourishes the soul is to be… understood. To be understood, a person must be raw, exposed… vulnerable.

I talk about wearing mask much of my life, and I have, as have we all. We are what we want the world to see; then we have who we confront every day in the mirror. I pray to God that I have put my masks away.

Here's the wrap:

I put my masks away, because I imagine my life through the eyes of one of God's "less perfect" children. I imagine what they see when they look in the mirror, and then face the world. I realized that they didn't care.

There is no chasm between those two people they see. They are the most real people on earth!

They don't pre-judge. They aren't concerned with labels of clothes, cars, or what celebrities they know. They are simple people who enjoy the simple things in life. And if we are smart we will take our lessons from them, and remind ourselves that it is the simple things in life that mean the most.

The good thing about kids with disabilities is they grow up to be adults who overcome their disabilities. And they remind us of the true realities of a happy life.

No rant, just truth. Thanks Diane…

© 2009 Kevin Jackson – The Black Sphere All Right Reserved

Obama promised the most ethical administration in the history of America. This declaration was supposed to convince us that Obama's administration will deal with the American people with openness and honesty. So far…I'm underwhelmed.

If the pork buried in Obama's $900B spending bill is any indication, I'd say that like Clinton redefined "is", Obama may be redefining "ethical".

Obama's spending package, he calls "stimulus", but that I call Obamulus is the perfect example of ethics as defined by Obama. 

Obamulus is being railroaded through the Senate, and as late as this morning, less than three hours before senators are due to vote on it, I have heard two senators admit that they haven't read it. 

Further breaking news is there is a provision for the Fed to track your health care coverage, and determine what treatments you can receive. Is there any doubt that we will continue to find additional bits of bacon buried within Obamulus?  That was a mouthful, huh?

Nevertheless in an effort to prove his sincerity in creating, [trumpets please] "the most ethical administration in history", yesterday it was announced that Obama will move the census bureau under the authority of the White House, and away from the Commerce Department.

This is hardly noteworthy news, one might think. Except when you consider that the census has the ability to reshape the electoral process.  Then it takes on ominous undertones, which by the way is my personal theme for Obama's administration.  The Obamious Undertones...catch their act, at a theater near you.

The Obaminous Undertones are nothing more than a gang of thieves, stealing democracy, and intent on ruining the republic that is America. This "open and honest" move is ACORN on steroids.

And the census comes along for Obama just in the nick of time for another part of Obama's plan: Job creation.

Recall that Obama's jobs creation or savings plan began at 2.5M; then grew to 3M, finally settling on 4.1M? Well the final jump likely came when Obama calculated in the 1.2M jobs that get created via the census.

So 1.2M of the 4.1M jobs that Obama will be creating is because of the census, and not Obama. These jobs would have been created if we had elected a Chimpanzee.  [Ok, I lobbed you a softball!]

Now don't think Obama won't take credit for these 1.2M new jobs. And the fact that these are "temp" jobs has no bearing on Obama's plan. Jobs is jobs folks.  So what are the parameters for these jobs?

First a federal census worker will earn between $10 and $25 an hour. Not exactly the high paying jobs promised in the campaign, but when you consider mostly ObamaBots will be getting these jobs, these will be considered high paying jobs. Don't be surprised to hear about Obamatrons quitting their permanent jobs, to get a raise working for the "gubment". But pay is not the issue here, control is.

Just like ACORN, this group of ObamaBots will be cheating like Obama's cabinet appointees at income tax time.  They will be counting illegal aliens, visiting aliens, intergalactic aliens, outergalactic aliens, and just about anything alien that moves…oh, in solidly Democratic states.  And of course they will not be counting hardworking, taxpaying Conservatives and Republicans in RED states. 

So what we will end up with is a rigged electoral count favoring Dems. And because the census will be handled by the White House, you can expect ethical treatment, as defined by Obama:  No oversight by the Commerce Department. Any guesses on how the Liberal media will report on this?  So the foxes will be guarding the hen house.

Here's the wrap:

This is a pure and simple Democrat power grab, that would essentially insure Obama's re-election in 2012. 

With legislation working its way through Congress to remove term limits, consider the ramifications of unlimited Obama?

Conservatives are getting punked. If we continue taking knives to gun fights, we might as well announce our allegiance to the US of Obama.

Obama is a lawyer, and a professional campaigner. He wants to guarantee the win, before the fight occurs. This is right out of Sun Tzu's The Art of War.  This move does just that, and Obama is reminding us that there are no ethics in fighting.

So if you take this lying down, then be prepared to take it bending over.

That's my rant!

© 2009 Kevin Jackson – The Black Sphere All Rights Reserved